Judge Anne C. Conway — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Anne C. Conway sits in the Middle District of Florida (MDFL) and granted a downward variance in 90 of 184 federal sentencings (48.9%) from FY2012–FY2024. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Anne C. Conway, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Anne C. Conway grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (90 below-guideline cases out of 184 cases identified)
- 1.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)24-39.5%
- 2.Avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants10-33.8%
- 3.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities8-65.6%
- 4.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense7-28.4%
- 5.Cooperation without motion (not §5K1.1) (aggregated reason)6-60.5%
- 6.(5H1.5) Previous employment record6-46.1%
- 7.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)6-35.8%
- 8.(5H1.4) Physical condition5-59.2%
- 9.Low Likelihood of Recidivism5-34.3%
- 10.Lack of Youthful Guidance4-23.2%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Anne C. Conway
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Anne C. Conway's 161 Zone D sentencings, 77 (47.8%) fell below range.
- Within range76(47.2%)
- Below range77(47.8%)avg −33.5% below min
- Above range8(5.0%)avg +80.2% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Anne C. Conway?
Want to see what those 90 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Anne C. Conway's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.