Judge Cameron McGowan Currie — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie sits in the District of South Carolina (DSC) and granted a downward variance in 95 of 223 federal sentencings (42.6%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Cameron McGowan Currie grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (95 below-guideline cases out of 223 cases identified)
- 1.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)22-25.1%
- 2.Avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants20-32.2%
- 3.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities17-33.9%
- 4.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)17-28.1%
- 5.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)14-30.1%
- 6.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse11-34.2%
- 7.Lack of Youthful Guidance11-22.4%
- 8.Rehabilitation10-30.3%
- 9.(5H1.5) Previous employment record9-43.8%
- 10.Crack/Powder Disparity9-30.5%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Cameron McGowan Currie
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Cameron McGowan Currie's 185 Zone D sentencings, 80 (43.2%) fell below range.
- Within range99(53.5%)
- Below range80(43.2%)avg −26.4% below min
- Above range6(3.2%)avg +41.6% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Cameron McGowan Currie?
Want to see what those 95 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Cameron McGowan Currie's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.