Judge Clifton L. Corker — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Clifton L. Corker sits in the Eastern District of Tennessee (EDTN) and granted a downward variance in 33 of 100 federal sentencings (33.0%) from FY2020–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Clifton L. Corker, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Clifton L. Corker grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (33 below-guideline cases out of 100 cases identified)
- 1.Remorse11-30.8%
- 2.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)9-11.1%
- 3.Acceptance of responsibility6-46.5%
- 4.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)6-36.4%
- 5.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)6-16.3%
- 6.Lack of Youthful Guidance5-13.3%
- 7.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance4-77.5%
- 8.(5H1.5) Previous employment record4-62.4%
- 9.Pursuant to a NONbinding (or unknown type) plea agreement4-31.1%
- 10.Mule/Role in the offense3-43.2%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Clifton L. Corker
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Clifton L. Corker's 85 Zone D sentencings, 30 (35.3%) fell below range.
- Within range50(58.8%)
- Below range30(35.3%)avg −23.3% below min
- Above range5(5.9%)avg +31.8% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Clifton L. Corker?
Want to see what those 33 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Clifton L. Corker's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.