Judge Cynthia M. Rufe — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe sits in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (EDPA) and granted a downward variance in 61 of 127 federal sentencings (48.0%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Cynthia M. Rufe, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Cynthia M. Rufe grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (61 below-guideline cases out of 127 cases identified)
- 1.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities15-45.7%
- 2.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)15-36.9%
- 3.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse10-44.8%
- 4.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense10-37.4%
- 5.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)10-32.2%
- 6.Conduct on Release/Bond/Supervision9-100.0%
- 7.Mule/Role in the offense8-51.9%
- 8.Nonviolent Offense7-57.5%
- 9.Pursuant to a NONbinding (or unknown type) plea agreement7-43.8%
- 10.(5H1.4) Physical condition6-53.9%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Cynthia M. Rufe
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Cynthia M. Rufe's 111 Zone D sentencings, 54 (48.6%) fell below range.
- Within range52(46.8%)
- Below range54(48.6%)avg −41.9% below min
- Above range5(4.5%)avg +64.3% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Cynthia M. Rufe?
Want to see what those 61 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Cynthia M. Rufe's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.