Judge James Ray Knepp — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge James Ray Knepp sits in the Northern District of Ohio (NDOH) and granted a downward variance in 43 of 71 federal sentencings (60.6%) from FY2021–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge James Ray Knepp, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge James Ray Knepp grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (43 below-guideline cases out of 71 cases identified)
- 1.Acceptance of responsibility21-48.6%
- 2.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)17-52.1%
- 3.Lack of Youthful Guidance16-56.9%
- 4.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)14-48.8%
- 5.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities14-48.6%
- 6.Remorse13-52.1%
- 7.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse8-50.2%
- 8.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)7-44.6%
- 9.(5H1.4) Physical condition7-40.9%
- 10.Totality of Circumstances/Combination of Factors (Cook/Koon)6-32.3%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge James Ray Knepp
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge James Ray Knepp's 57 Zone D sentencings, 35 (61.4%) fell below range.
- Within range19(33.3%)
- Below range35(61.4%)avg −31.9% below min
- Above range3(5.3%)avg +46.5% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge James Ray Knepp?
Want to see what those 43 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge James Ray Knepp's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.