Judge John David Russell — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge John David Russell sits in the Northern District of Oklahoma (NDOK) and granted a downward variance in 46 of 113 federal sentencings (40.7%) from FY2021–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge John David Russell, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge John David Russell grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (46 below-guideline cases out of 113 cases identified)
- 1.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance25-52.3%
- 2.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)15-48.9%
- 3.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)10-51.9%
- 4.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse9-49.9%
- 5.Pursuant to a NONbinding (or unknown type) plea agreement8-68.0%
- 6.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)7-42.5%
- 7.Mule/Role in the offense6-53.4%
- 8.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities5-79.2%
- 9.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)5-63.3%
- 10.(5H1.5) Previous employment record4-61.3%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge John David Russell
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge John David Russell's 97 Zone D sentencings, 35 (36.1%) fell below range.
- Within range44(45.4%)
- Below range35(36.1%)avg −47.1% below min
- Above range18(18.6%)avg +47.9% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge John David Russell?
Want to see what those 46 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge John David Russell's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.