Judge John E. Steele — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge John E. Steele sits in the Middle District of Florida (MDFL) and granted a downward variance in 100 of 200 federal sentencings (50.0%) from FY2012–FY2021. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge John E. Steele, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge John E. Steele grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (100 below-guideline cases out of 200 cases identified)
- 1.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)62-33.3%
- 2.Avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants14-37.7%
- 3.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities10-46.8%
- 4.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)7-75.6%
- 5.Cooperation without motion (not §5K1.1) (aggregated reason)7-52.1%
- 6.(5H1.5) Previous employment record6-69.7%
- 7.Mule/Role in the offense5-55.0%
- 8.(5H1.3) Mental and emotional conditions5-47.4%
- 9.(5H1.4) Physical condition5-43.4%
- 10.Cultural Assimilation5-41.2%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge John E. Steele
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge John E. Steele's 152 Zone D sentencings, 84 (55.3%) fell below range.
- Within range64(42.1%)
- Below range84(55.3%)avg −33.5% below min
- Above range4(2.6%)avg +59.5% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge John E. Steele?
Want to see what those 100 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge John E. Steele's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.