Judge Karin Johanna Immergut — Federal Sentencing Patterns

U.S. District Judge Karin Johanna Immergut sits in the District of Oregon (DOR) and granted a downward variance in 39 of 69 federal sentencings (56.5%) from FY2020–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Karin Johanna Immergut, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.

Top reasons Judge Karin Johanna Immergut grants downward variances

Reasons included across all guideline chapters (39 below-guideline cases out of 69 cases identified)

ReasonCasesAvg % Below Min
  1. 1.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)25-34.8%
  2. 2.Acceptance of responsibility9-38.8%
  3. 3.Remorse8-30.0%
  4. 4.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense7-49.1%
  5. 5.Early Plea7-32.2%
  6. 6.Waiver of appeal6-64.6%
  7. 7.Rehabilitation5-47.9%
  8. 8.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)5-46.8%
  9. 9.(5H1.5) Previous employment record4-49.2%
  10. 10.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance4-40.3%

Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Karin Johanna Immergut

Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Karin Johanna Immergut's 48 Zone D sentencings, 30 (62.5%) fell below range.

Zone D · imprisonment recommended48 cases
  • Within range
    17(35.4%)
  • Below range
    30(62.5%)
    avg −32.4% below min
  • Above range
    1(2.1%)
    avg +34.2% above max

Need case-level analysis for Judge Karin Johanna Immergut?

Want to see what those 39 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.

Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Karin Johanna Immergut's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.

EXPLORE JUST METRICS →