Judge Karin Johanna Immergut — Federal Sentencing Patterns

U.S. District Judge Karin Johanna Immergut sits in the District of Oregon (DOR) and granted a downward variance in 30 of 52 federal sentencings (57.7%) from FY2021–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Karin Johanna Immergut, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.

Top reasons Judge Karin Johanna Immergut grants downward variances

Reasons included across all guideline chapters (30 below-guideline cases out of 52 cases identified)

ReasonCasesAvg % Below Min
  1. 1.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)20-33.8%
  2. 2.Early Plea7-32.2%
  3. 3.Remorse7-26.0%
  4. 4.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense6-40.6%
  5. 5.Acceptance of responsibility6-25.5%
  6. 6.Waiver of appeal5-57.6%
  7. 7.Rehabilitation5-47.9%
  8. 8.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)5-46.8%
  9. 9.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse3-66.3%
  10. 10.Mule/Role in the offense3-58.3%

Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Karin Johanna Immergut

Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Karin Johanna Immergut's 37 Zone D sentencings, 24 (64.9%) fell below range.

Zone D · imprisonment recommended37 cases
  • Within range
    12(32.4%)
  • Below range
    24(64.9%)
    avg −34.4% below min
  • Above range
    1(2.7%)
    avg +34.2% above max

Need case-level analysis for Judge Karin Johanna Immergut?

Want to see what those 30 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.

Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Karin Johanna Immergut's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.

EXPLORE JUST METRICS →