Judge Leo T. Sorokin — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin sits in the District of Massachusetts (DMA) and granted a downward variance in 122 of 167 federal sentencings (73.1%) from FY2015–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Leo T. Sorokin, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Leo T. Sorokin grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (122 below-guideline cases out of 167 cases identified)
- 1.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)37-51.3%
- 2.Acceptance of responsibility29-60.1%
- 3.Mule/Role in the offense23-46.6%
- 4.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities20-52.4%
- 5.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)17-36.3%
- 6.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)16-42.1%
- 7.Rehabilitation14-66.2%
- 8.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)12-56.6%
- 9.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse11-51.8%
- 10.Pursuant to a NONbinding (or unknown type) plea agreement10-36.8%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Leo T. Sorokin
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Leo T. Sorokin's 143 Zone D sentencings, 110 (76.9%) fell below range.
- Within range32(22.4%)
- Below range110(76.9%)avg −43.3% below min
- Above range1(0.7%)avg +5.0% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Leo T. Sorokin?
Want to see what those 122 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Leo T. Sorokin's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.