Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers sits in the Northern District of Florida (NDFL) and granted a downward variance in 151 of 363 federal sentencings (41.6%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (151 below-guideline cases out of 363 cases identified)
- 1.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)76-50.2%
- 2.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities32-59.3%
- 3.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)23-51.7%
- 4.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)22-49.9%
- 5.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance22-47.7%
- 6.Nonviolent Offense20-54.0%
- 7.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse17-45.8%
- 8.(5H1.5) Previous employment record16-56.0%
- 9.Acceptance of responsibility15-57.9%
- 10.Cooperation without motion (not §5K1.1) (aggregated reason)14-43.6%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers's 270 Zone D sentencings, 119 (44.1%) fell below range.
- Within range137(50.7%)
- Below range119(44.1%)avg −44.5% below min
- Above range14(5.2%)avg +87.3% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers?
Want to see what those 151 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Margaret Catharine Rodgers's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.