Judge Mark A. Kearney — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Mark A. Kearney sits in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (EDPA) and granted a downward variance in 65 of 93 federal sentencings (69.9%) from FY2014–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Mark A. Kearney, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Mark A. Kearney grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (65 below-guideline cases out of 93 cases identified)
- 1.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)34-45.5%
- 2.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities31-49.0%
- 3.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)28-49.1%
- 4.Acceptance of responsibility20-52.4%
- 5.Remorse19-45.3%
- 6.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense16-51.6%
- 7.(5K2.20) Aberrant Behavior15-52.3%
- 8.(5H1.5) Previous employment record15-51.7%
- 9.Mule/Role in the offense11-33.4%
- 10.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse11-31.7%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Mark A. Kearney
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Mark A. Kearney's 74 Zone D sentencings, 52 (70.3%) fell below range.
- Within range17(23.0%)
- Below range52(70.3%)avg −40.2% below min
- Above range5(6.8%)avg +17.6% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Mark A. Kearney?
Want to see what those 65 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Mark A. Kearney's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.