Judge Mark G. Mastroianni — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni sits in the District of Massachusetts (DMA) and granted a downward variance in 117 of 173 federal sentencings (67.6%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Mark G. Mastroianni grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (117 below-guideline cases out of 173 cases identified)
- 1.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities50-58.6%
- 2.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)28-60.6%
- 3.Rehabilitation23-55.6%
- 4.(5H1.6) Community ties22-70.5%
- 5.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)21-56.4%
- 6.Lack of Youthful Guidance21-40.4%
- 7.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)20-44.6%
- 8.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)16-43.0%
- 9.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse14-48.4%
- 10.(5H1.5) Previous employment record11-82.7%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Mark G. Mastroianni
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Mark G. Mastroianni's 143 Zone D sentencings, 106 (74.1%) fell below range.
- Within range28(19.6%)
- Below range106(74.1%)avg −46.2% below min
- Above range9(6.3%)avg +40.0% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Mark G. Mastroianni?
Want to see what those 117 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Mark G. Mastroianni's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.