Judge Mary Stenson Scriven — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Mary Stenson Scriven sits in the Middle District of Florida (MDFL) and granted a downward variance in 268 of 367 federal sentencings (73.0%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Mary Stenson Scriven, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Mary Stenson Scriven grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (268 below-guideline cases out of 367 cases identified)
- 1.Remorse80-43.1%
- 2.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities77-47.7%
- 3.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)76-49.9%
- 4.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)75-42.2%
- 5.Lack of Youthful Guidance45-34.7%
- 6.Rehabilitation43-46.0%
- 7.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)43-41.4%
- 8.Cooperation without motion (not §5K1.1) (aggregated reason)39-37.3%
- 9.Avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants27-41.7%
- 10.(5H1.4) Physical condition26-47.7%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Mary Stenson Scriven
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Mary Stenson Scriven's 321 Zone D sentencings, 237 (73.8%) fell below range.
- Within range74(23.1%)
- Below range237(73.8%)avg −38.3% below min
- Above range10(3.1%)avg +21.6% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Mary Stenson Scriven?
Want to see what those 268 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Mary Stenson Scriven's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.