Judge Michael Jerome McShane — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Michael Jerome McShane sits in the District of Oregon (DOR) and granted a downward variance in 50 of 75 federal sentencings (66.7%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Michael Jerome McShane, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Michael Jerome McShane grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (50 below-guideline cases out of 75 cases identified)
- 1.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)35-35.3%
- 2.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse21-28.9%
- 3.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)20-30.8%
- 4.Lack of Youthful Guidance17-31.5%
- 5.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)15-50.1%
- 6.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities15-44.4%
- 7.Rehabilitation14-52.1%
- 8.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense12-36.8%
- 9.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)12-18.9%
- 10.Victim Impact10-23.7%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Michael Jerome McShane
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Michael Jerome McShane's 66 Zone D sentencings, 43 (65.2%) fell below range.
- Within range14(21.2%)
- Below range43(65.2%)avg −32.6% below min
- Above range9(13.6%)avg +26.6% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Michael Jerome McShane?
Want to see what those 50 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Michael Jerome McShane's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.