Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald sits in the Central District of California (CDCA) and granted a downward variance in 182 of 232 federal sentencings (78.4%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (182 below-guideline cases out of 232 cases identified)
- 1.Mule/Role in the offense74-37.2%
- 2.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities69-39.0%
- 3.Mens Rea55-38.2%
- 4.Lack of Youthful Guidance53-37.7%
- 5.Remorse45-44.0%
- 6.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)39-42.9%
- 7.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse37-33.5%
- 8.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)36-42.7%
- 9.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)29-35.6%
- 10.(5H1.5) Previous employment record25-41.2%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald's 196 Zone D sentencings, 160 (81.6%) fell below range.
- Within range33(16.8%)
- Below range160(81.6%)avg −35.6% below min
- Above range3(1.5%)avg +47.1% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald?
Want to see what those 182 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.