Judge Michael W. Mosman — Federal Sentencing Patterns

U.S. District Judge Michael W. Mosman sits in the District of Oregon (DOR) and granted a downward variance in 27 of 43 federal sentencings (62.8%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Michael W. Mosman, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.

Top reasons Judge Michael W. Mosman grants downward variances

Reasons included across all guideline chapters (27 below-guideline cases out of 43 cases identified)

ReasonCasesAvg % Below Min
  1. 1.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)17-44.5%
  2. 2.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense8-57.7%
  3. 3.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)4-30.7%
  4. 4.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)3-33.8%
  5. 5.Time Served3-24.1%

Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Michael W. Mosman

Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Michael W. Mosman's 33 Zone D sentencings, 22 (66.7%) fell below range.

Zone D · imprisonment recommended33 cases
  • Within range
    6(18.2%)
  • Below range
    22(66.7%)
    avg −41.2% below min
  • Above range
    5(15.2%)
    avg +93.3% above max

Need case-level analysis for Judge Michael W. Mosman?

Want to see what those 27 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.

Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Michael W. Mosman's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.

EXPLORE JUST METRICS →