Judge Randolph Moss — Federal Sentencing Patterns

U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss sits in the District of Columbia (DDC) and granted a downward variance in 56 of 71 federal sentencings (78.9%) from FY2014–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Randolph Moss, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.

Top reasons Judge Randolph Moss grants downward variances

Reasons included across all guideline chapters (56 below-guideline cases out of 71 cases identified)

ReasonCasesAvg % Below Min
  1. 1.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities34-44.7%
  2. 2.Remorse23-41.0%
  3. 3.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)20-39.8%
  4. 4.Acceptance of responsibility18-43.2%
  5. 5.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)17-43.8%
  6. 6.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)16-46.4%
  7. 7.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)14-58.1%
  8. 8.Mule/Role in the offense9-62.7%
  9. 9.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse9-36.9%
  10. 10.(5H1.4) Physical condition8-41.2%

Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Randolph Moss

Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Randolph Moss's 63 Zone D sentencings, 51 (81.0%) fell below range.

Zone D · imprisonment recommended63 cases
  • Within range
    12(19.0%)
  • Below range
    51(81.0%)
    avg −43.6% below min
  • Above range
    0(0.0%)

Need case-level analysis for Judge Randolph Moss?

Want to see what those 56 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.

Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Randolph Moss's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.

EXPLORE JUST METRICS →