Judge Sara Lynn Darrow — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Sara Lynn Darrow sits in the Central District of Illinois (CDIL) and granted a downward variance in 147 of 315 federal sentencings (46.7%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Sara Lynn Darrow, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Sara Lynn Darrow grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (147 below-guideline cases out of 315 cases identified)
- 1.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)49-26.7%
- 2.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)27-27.7%
- 3.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)26-25.8%
- 4.Avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants21-36.6%
- 5.Rehabilitation15-53.4%
- 6.Cooperation without motion (not §5K1.1) (aggregated reason)11-43.2%
- 7.Mule/Role in the offense11-39.7%
- 8.General Guideline Adequacy Issues (aggregated reason)11-37.8%
- 9.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance11-29.3%
- 10.Pursuant to a NONbinding (or unknown type) plea agreement10-27.9%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Sara Lynn Darrow
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Sara Lynn Darrow's 281 Zone D sentencings, 137 (48.8%) fell below range.
- Within range115(40.9%)
- Below range137(48.8%)avg −28.2% below min
- Above range29(10.3%)avg +53.4% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Sara Lynn Darrow?
Want to see what those 147 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Sara Lynn Darrow's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.