Judge Timothy M. Cain — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge Timothy M. Cain sits in the District of South Carolina (DSC) and granted a downward variance in 122 of 353 federal sentencings (34.6%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Timothy M. Cain, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge Timothy M. Cain grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (122 below-guideline cases out of 353 cases identified)
- 1.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)27-43.9%
- 2.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense11-65.0%
- 3.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities9-66.1%
- 4.(5H1.4) Physical condition9-60.8%
- 5.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse8-57.2%
- 6.Pursuant to a NONbinding (or unknown type) plea agreement7-84.4%
- 7.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)7-50.9%
- 8.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)7-41.5%
- 9.(5H1.5) Previous employment record5-75.0%
- 10.Lack of Youthful Guidance5-27.5%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Timothy M. Cain
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Timothy M. Cain's 273 Zone D sentencings, 98 (35.9%) fell below range.
- Within range168(61.5%)
- Below range98(35.9%)avg −46.9% below min
- Above range7(2.6%)avg +66.3% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge Timothy M. Cain?
Want to see what those 122 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Timothy M. Cain's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.