Judge Timothy Mark Burgess — Federal Sentencing Patterns

U.S. District Judge Timothy Mark Burgess sits in the District of Alaska (DAK) and granted a downward variance in 249 of 410 federal sentencings (60.7%) from FY2012–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge Timothy Mark Burgess, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.

Top reasons Judge Timothy Mark Burgess grants downward variances

Reasons included across all guideline chapters (249 below-guideline cases out of 410 cases identified)

ReasonCasesAvg % Below Min
  1. 1.Avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants26-35.5%
  2. 2.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)25-33.6%
  3. 3.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)20-37.3%
  4. 4.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse12-39.4%
  5. 5.Provide Restitution to any victims of the offense8-51.9%
  6. 6.Non-Crack Drug Table Disparity7-39.0%
  7. 7.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)7-34.5%
  8. 8.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)6-38.2%
  9. 9.Rehabilitation5-56.6%
  10. 10.Mule/Role in the offense5-53.9%

Zone D sentencing variance — Judge Timothy Mark Burgess

Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge Timothy Mark Burgess's 348 Zone D sentencings, 216 (62.1%) fell below range.

Zone D · imprisonment recommended348 cases
  • Within range
    114(32.8%)
  • Below range
    216(62.1%)
    avg −38.6% below min
  • Above range
    18(5.2%)
    avg +31.8% above max

Need case-level analysis for Judge Timothy Mark Burgess?

Want to see what those 249 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.

Just Metrics also surfaces Judge Timothy Mark Burgess's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.

EXPLORE JUST METRICS →