Judge William F. Jung — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge William F. Jung sits in the Middle District of Florida (MDFL) and granted a downward variance in 101 of 187 federal sentencings (54.0%) from FY2019–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge William F. Jung, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge William F. Jung grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (101 below-guideline cases out of 187 cases identified)
- 1.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities38-38.9%
- 2.Indigent background34-23.9%
- 3.Remorse27-32.8%
- 4.Reduce Disparity (aggregated reason)23-34.5%
- 5.Lack of Youthful Guidance22-29.6%
- 6.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)18-56.8%
- 7.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance18-54.5%
- 8.Cooperation without motion (not §5K1.1) (aggregated reason)17-36.0%
- 9.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)17-31.9%
- 10.Nonviolent Offense15-55.3%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge William F. Jung
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge William F. Jung's 176 Zone D sentencings, 95 (54.0%) fell below range.
- Within range55(31.3%)
- Below range95(54.0%)avg −32.8% below min
- Above range26(14.8%)avg +69.4% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge William F. Jung?
Want to see what those 101 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge William F. Jung's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.