Judge William Lindsay Osteen — Federal Sentencing Patterns
U.S. District Judge William Lindsay Osteen sits in the Middle District of North Carolina (MDNC) and granted a downward variance in 53 of 128 federal sentencings (41.4%) from FY2013–FY2025. This page shows aggregate sentencing patterns for Judge William Lindsay Osteen, including the most common reasons cited on the Statement of Reasons (SOR) for granting a downward variance.
Top reasons Judge William Lindsay Osteen grants downward variances
Reasons included across all guideline chapters (53 below-guideline cases out of 128 cases identified)
- 1.Criminal History Issues (aggregated reason)16-26.3%
- 2.(5H1.5) Previous employment record11-35.6%
- 3.(5H1.1) Age (Defendant's youth or old age)10-32.1%
- 4.(5H1.6) Family ties and responsibilities8-39.4%
- 5.Mental and Emotional Conditions (aggregated reason)7-48.3%
- 6.(5H1.2) Educational and vocational skills7-29.9%
- 7.(5H1.4) Drug dependence and alcohol abuse6-29.9%
- 8.Mule/Role in the offense6-21.5%
- 9.(5H1.4) Physical condition5-45.0%
- 10.(5K2.0) General aggravating or mitigating circumstance5-20.0%
Zone D sentencing variance — Judge William Lindsay Osteen
Imprisonment-only recommended sentencing zone (offense level 14+ at any criminal history). Of Judge William Lindsay Osteen's 113 Zone D sentencings, 51 (45.1%) fell below range.
- Within range48(42.5%)
- Below range51(45.1%)avg −30.8% below min
- Above range14(12.4%)avg +54.6% above max
Need case-level analysis for Judge William Lindsay Osteen?
Want to see what those 53 below-guideline cases actually looked like? Just Metrics shows you the actual matched cases — same judge, same guideline chapter, same guideline range — and tells you what they did.
Just Metrics also surfaces Judge William Lindsay Osteen's trial tax (sentences after trial vs. plea) and the average §5K1.1 cooperation discount.